Direct answer: what is Cisco Meraki vMX Small?

Cisco Meraki vMX Small is the smallest size in the Meraki virtual MX family. It is a software-based security and SD-WAN appliance intended to provide Meraki connectivity functions in cloud environments where a physical MX appliance is not the practical form factor. Its most common role is to terminate Meraki Auto VPN connections from branches, teleworker locations or other Meraki networks and provide controlled access to applications, servers and services hosted in a cloud virtual network.

It is mainly used by organizations that already operate, or plan to operate, a Meraki-managed WAN and want a cloud-side headend that appears in the same Meraki Dashboard management experience. It can also be relevant for businesses replacing manually maintained IPsec headends with a Meraki Auto VPN design, or for companies moving workloads from a physical data centre into cloud infrastructure while retaining branch connectivity.

The best candidates are small to mid-sized Meraki deployments whose cloud-bound traffic and tunnel count fit within the vMX Small design envelope. Current Cisco sizing guidance lists 250 Mbps firewall throughput, 250 Mbps VPN throughput, 50 maximum site-to-site VPN tunnels, 50 maximum client VPN tunnels, 25,000 maximum concurrent sessions and a recommended maximum of approximately 500 devices. Those figures are design references rather than promises of application performance in every cloud environment.

The most important factor to confirm is the complete traffic and resiliency model: expected aggregate VPN throughput, number of branches, concurrent sessions, security features, routing topology, cloud provider, regional design and growth. FourTeck can help translate those inputs into a vMX Small, Medium or Large sizing decision and identify the license term and deployment scope needed for a practical quotation.

Why vMX Small exists in the Meraki architecture

A conventional branch firewall is a physical appliance installed where users, local servers and internet circuits are located. Cloud workloads change that model. Applications may run in a virtual private cloud or virtual network, and there may be no physical rack in which to install a traditional appliance. The vMX family gives Meraki customers a virtual appliance that can be instantiated inside supported cloud infrastructure and managed from the Meraki Dashboard, allowing the cloud environment to participate in the same secure WAN fabric used by the branches.

For a Dubai-based company with offices across the UAE or wider region, a common requirement is to connect branch MX appliances to workloads hosted in a cloud region. Without a cloud-side VPN concentrator, the organization might build and maintain separate IPsec tunnels, cloud gateways, routing policies and monitoring processes. vMX can simplify that operational model when Meraki Auto VPN is already central to the branch design. The benefit is less about a single headline throughput figure and more about reducing the number of independently configured VPN relationships.

vMX Small occupies the entry point in this virtual family. It is not simply a lower-priced version of a larger appliance; it has defined throughput, tunnel and session limits that should be treated as architecture constraints. If the environment is expected to exceed 50 branch tunnels, drive sustained traffic near the 250 Mbps range, or grow substantially after migration, the Medium or Large size can be the more appropriate design even when the initial phase appears small.

Cisco Meraki vMX Small sizing: the numbers that matter

Current Cisco Meraki sizing documentation should be the starting point for selection. Benchmarks are produced under defined test conditions, and real application performance varies with packet size, traffic mix, latency, cloud instance behavior, routing design and enabled services. Treat the figures below as engineering limits and comparison points rather than as a guarantee that every production workload will sustain the maximum value.

A practical sizing exercise should not start by asking how many employees the company has. Start with branch count, expected concurrent traffic into the cloud, business-critical applications, traffic direction, remote-access sessions, security features and growth. A 100-user organization running large backups, virtual desktop sessions or data replication can create more load than a 400-user organization whose cloud traffic is mainly browser-based business applications.

Supported deployment environments and cloud design considerations

Cisco Meraki positions the vMX family for cloud deployment and currently identifies major supported platforms including Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and Alibaba Cloud. Availability of a specific image, marketplace offer, region, instance type or deployment mechanism can change, so the cloud platform and target region should be confirmed at quotation and implementation time. The Meraki license is only one part of the operating model; the cloud provider will also have infrastructure, traffic and resource costs under its own commercial terms.

The vMX must be placed into the correct cloud network construct and connected to the subnets that contain the applications it needs to reach. That means the network team needs to understand cloud route tables, virtual networking, security groups or equivalent controls, IP addressing and whether the vMX will operate as a one-armed VPN concentrator or in a routed/NAT design supported by the relevant firmware and cloud deployment model. A cloud engineer and a Meraki network engineer should agree on the packet path before the instance is created.

Cloud egress and inter-region costs can materially affect the economics of a vMX design. If branches send large volumes of data to a cloud workload and responses return over the same path, the business should model not only Meraki licensing but also cloud traffic charges and the cost of any inter-region or inter-zone transfer. This is particularly important for backup, media, analytics and replication workloads that generate sustained data movement.

Latency matters as much as throughput for interactive applications. Hosting a vMX in a distant region may still work technically, but users can experience slower application response because the branch-to-cloud path is longer. The preferred cloud region should therefore be chosen based on application hosting, user geography, redundancy objectives and regulatory or data residency requirements, not simply on which region appears first in the deployment wizard.

Meraki Dashboard and operational model

The operational attraction of vMX is its alignment with the Meraki Dashboard. Organizations that already manage physical MX appliances can add the cloud side of the WAN to the same cloud-managed environment. Policies, VPN participation, firmware lifecycle tasks, monitoring and troubleshooting can be handled through a common administrative interface. This can reduce the training and process overhead that comes from operating an unrelated virtual firewall solely because the applications moved into a cloud provider.

Central management does not eliminate the need for good network engineering. The Dashboard can automate and simplify configuration, but it cannot correct an addressing conflict, an incorrect cloud route, asymmetric forwarding, an undersized appliance or a poorly designed failover process. During implementation, the team should document who owns the Meraki configuration and who owns the cloud-side networking. Many deployment issues occur at the boundary between those two responsibilities.

For day-two operations, the organization should decide how alerts will be handled, which administrators receive access, whether configuration templates are used, how API automation is governed and what evidence is retained for change control. A vMX that provides connectivity to important cloud applications may become a critical infrastructure component even if the virtual appliance itself is small. Monitoring and administrative controls should reflect the business importance of the applications behind it.

Licensing: what must be included with vMX Small

Every vMX instance requires Meraki licensing. The correct license is not a generic afterthought; it determines legal entitlement to use the appliance, the supported feature tier and the service term. Cisco Meraki currently supports subscription licensing and co-termination licensing, while per-device licensing remains restricted to organizations already operating under that model. Licensing models cannot be mixed within the same Meraki organization, so an existing customer’s organization type must be identified before the quote is finalized.

Under co-termination licensing, vMX has Enterprise and Advanced Security options on supported firmware. Enterprise is oriented around essential SD-WAN, secure connectivity and the core Meraki feature set. Advanced Security adds supported security services such as intrusion detection and prevention and content filtering for vMX on firmware versions that support those capabilities. Cisco documentation also describes subscription licensing tiers differently, so buyers should not assume that a co-term SKU name can simply be copied into a subscription order.

For co-term environments, Cisco documentation lists vMX license SKU patterns such as LIC-VMX-S-ENT-[X]Y for vMX Small Enterprise and LIC-VMX-S-SEC-[X]Y for vMX Small Advanced Security, where the term is represented by the year component. Exact orderable part numbers, available terms and commercial programs can change, so the quotation should use the current Cisco configuration rather than relying on an old purchase order or screenshot.

Subscription licensing is designed around fixed subscription terms and newer hardware-agnostic family concepts. Cisco documentation currently indicates subscription terms can range from 36 to 84 months, with customer-determined start and end dates, subject to the applicable program and region. For UAE buyers, the practical action is to have the reseller validate the current Cisco subscription offer, feature tier and start-date requirements at the time of quotation.

Licensing also affects support access and the operational lifecycle. A business should therefore align the license term with its cloud project horizon, budget cycle and renewal governance. If the vMX supports a critical application environment, treat renewal planning as part of service continuity rather than as an annual procurement reminder that can be handled after expiration notices arrive.

Enterprise vs Advanced Security: choose based on traffic role

The license decision should follow the role the vMX will perform. If the appliance is primarily a secure SD-WAN and Auto VPN termination point and the organization already protects cloud applications with other native or virtual security controls, the core enterprise feature set may be sufficient. If traffic will traverse the vMX as a security enforcement point and the design requires IDS/IPS or supported content-filtering functions on the vMX, Advanced Security should be evaluated.

Do not select Advanced Security merely because the name sounds more comprehensive. Security inspection consumes capacity and changes the performance reference. Cisco’s current sizing documentation lists vMX Small NGFW throughput around 200 Mbps for Advanced Security prevention testing, compared with 250 Mbps firewall and VPN throughput references. If the expected traffic is already close to those levels, choosing the security tier may also push the architecture toward vMX Medium.

The reverse mistake is equally important. Buying only a connectivity-oriented license and later discovering that the cloud security design expected the vMX to perform threat inspection can create a project gap. The security architecture should show which controls are enforced on the branch MX, which are enforced by the vMX, which are enforced by cloud-native services and which are handled at the application layer.

For complex environments, a layered model is normal. The vMX may provide SD-WAN and routing while cloud-native firewalls, workload security, identity controls and application gateways provide other protections. The objective is not to force every control into the vMX; it is to define the packet path and ensure there is no unintended gap or duplicate inspection that adds latency without meaningful risk reduction.

Routing, VPN topology and branch connectivity

The vMX Small can participate in Meraki Auto VPN and supports routing features that allow it to exchange reachability with the surrounding environment. Cisco documentation lists supported capabilities including Auto VPN, IPsec VPN, VPN firewall, BGP and OSPF, along with one-armed concentrator and NAT-mode options on supported firmware. Which of those features should be used depends on the cloud topology and whether the vMX is a transit point, a security boundary or simply a VPN termination appliance.

For a straightforward branch-to-cloud design, branches advertise their local subnets into the Meraki VPN fabric and the vMX provides a path toward the application subnets in the cloud. The cloud route tables must also know how to return traffic to the branch networks. If the return path bypasses the vMX, sessions can fail because of asymmetry, stateful policy or missing routes. This is one of the most common design areas that should be validated before production cutover.

Hub-and-spoke topology is often selected when branches mainly need cloud access and do not need full branch-to-branch connectivity. Full-mesh or more complex topologies can increase tunnel count and routing complexity. Since vMX Small supports a maximum of 50 site-to-site VPN tunnels in current sizing guidance, the topology should be modeled using the actual branch count and planned growth rather than the number of branches active on day one.

Third-party VPN peers may also be relevant during migration, for example when a cloud environment needs temporary connectivity to a non-Meraki firewall, a partner network or a legacy data centre. Manual IPsec design introduces its own encryption-domain, proposal, routing and troubleshooting requirements. A migration plan should distinguish temporary coexistence tunnels from the desired steady-state architecture so that short-term exceptions do not become permanent complexity.

Dynamic routing can improve resilience and reduce manual route maintenance, but it requires clear ownership. BGP or OSPF sessions should be designed with route filtering, preferred path behavior and failure scenarios in mind. If cloud routers or transit services are part of the path, document which device originates each prefix and how convergence occurs when one virtual appliance or region becomes unavailable.

High availability and resilience: understand the vMX model

Buyers familiar with physical MX appliances may expect a traditional warm-spare pair. vMX resilience is different. Cisco documentation has historically stated that traditional MX warm-spare HA is not the supported vMX model, while current licensing documentation describes active-active high availability designs using multiple vMX instances with eBGP to cloud routers. The practical conclusion is that resilience is an architecture, not a checkbox on one vMX Small instance.

For a critical cloud environment, consider deploying more than one vMX instance across appropriate fault domains, availability zones or regions and using cloud routing to control failover. The exact design depends heavily on the chosen cloud provider because each platform handles route propagation, virtual routers, next hops and health detection differently. The network team should test not only whether the second vMX is reachable but also how quickly routes converge and whether existing sessions survive or need to be re-established.

Business continuity may require region-level resilience rather than only instance-level resilience. If an application stack already runs across two regions, placing vMX capacity in only one region can create a networking single point of failure. Conversely, duplicating vMX instances without duplicating application services may add cost without materially improving service availability. The WAN design should follow the application recovery architecture.

Recovery procedures should include Meraki Dashboard access, cloud administrator access, route validation and a documented method for confirming which vMX is carrying traffic. During an incident, operations teams should not have to discover for the first time which cloud route table controls branch traffic. Design documentation should therefore include normal and failure-state packet paths.

When vMX Small is a strong fit

A strong fit normally has comfortable headroom. If business traffic averages 180 to 220 Mbps and frequently bursts higher, selecting a 250 Mbps-class virtual appliance leaves little allowance for growth, feature changes or abnormal traffic events. Sizing should include a capacity margin appropriate to the application’s criticality rather than designing to a theoretical maximum.

The same principle applies to tunnels. An organization with 45 active branches is technically under the 50-tunnel maximum, but it has little room for new sites, temporary migration tunnels, test networks or acquisitions. A Medium design may be operationally safer even if the Small model can handle the immediate count.

When to evaluate vMX Medium instead

Cisco Meraki vMX Medium is the next step up and current sizing guidance lists 500 Mbps VPN and firewall throughput, 250 site-to-site VPN tunnels, 250 maximum client VPN tunnels, approximately 2,500 recommended devices and 125,000 maximum concurrent sessions. Those differences are substantial. Medium is not only for organizations that need twice the bandwidth; it also provides five times the site-to-site tunnel scale and significantly more session capacity.

Evaluate Medium when the project has more than 50 branches, when the organization expects rapid expansion, when sustained encrypted traffic approaches Small’s practical headroom, or when cloud-hosted applications create large numbers of concurrent connections. Medium can also be the safer option for central services used by many branches because short traffic spikes from backup, patch distribution, file synchronization or business-intelligence workloads can consume capacity quickly.

The cost comparison should include engineering risk. A smaller virtual appliance can look economical at purchase time, but an early resize may require change control, maintenance windows, licensing adjustments and cloud routing updates. If the design forecast already places the environment near a Small limit within the license term, buying the next size can reduce operational disruption.

This does not mean Medium should be chosen automatically. Oversizing adds licensing and cloud infrastructure cost that may not deliver additional business value. The decision should be driven by measured or credibly forecast traffic, tunnel count, sessions and growth rather than by a general preference for the larger model.

vMX Small, Medium and Large comparison

The virtual MX family is intentionally simple to compare. Small, Medium and Large represent progressively higher performance and scale. The table below uses current Cisco Meraki sizing guidance and is useful for initial selection; final design should still account for cloud architecture, real traffic patterns and licensing.

The transition points are clear: Small is suited to modest cloud headend requirements; Medium supports significantly more branches and sessions; Large is aimed at high-scale environments. If a design needs more than 1 Gbps of encrypted aggregate throughput or more than 1,000 site-to-site tunnels, the architecture itself should be reviewed rather than assuming another vMX size will solve the requirement.

Security capability and practical policy design

On supported firmware and licensing, the vMX can provide more than VPN termination. Cisco documentation for vMX includes Layer 3 and Layer 7 firewall capabilities, content filtering and intrusion detection/prevention support introduced for vMX on newer MX firmware branches. That expands the possible role of a vMX, but it also means buyers need to define whether the virtual appliance is primarily a network connectivity component or an active inspection point.

Layer 3 firewall policy should be based on application requirements and least privilege. A branch network that only needs access to a small set of cloud application subnets should not automatically receive broad connectivity to the entire cloud network. Network segmentation remains important even when Auto VPN makes the transport easy to deploy. Cloud security groups or equivalent controls can provide an additional layer close to the workloads.

Layer 7 controls and traffic analytics can improve visibility into application behavior. However, policies should be tested with production applications because broad application blocking or content filtering can affect embedded services, update mechanisms and third-party integrations. Security controls should be introduced through staged change windows with monitoring, not enabled as a large undifferentiated policy on the first day of migration.

IDS/IPS is most valuable when the vMX is on the traffic path that needs inspection. If cloud applications are accessed through a different gateway or if service-to-service traffic bypasses the vMX, those flows will not receive inspection merely because the vMX exists in the environment. Architecture diagrams should therefore show which traffic classes actually traverse each security control.

Client VPN and remote-user considerations

Cisco Meraki documentation lists client VPN support for vMX, and current sizing guidance lists 50 maximum client VPN tunnels for the Small model. This can make vMX useful when remote users need direct access to applications hosted in the same cloud environment. The design can avoid sending remote-user traffic through a branch or data centre when the destination is already in the cloud.

Remote-access design should still be separated from site-to-site design. Site-to-site tunnels are normally stable infrastructure relationships between networks; client VPN sessions are user-driven, variable and sensitive to authentication, endpoint software and internet conditions. A project that expects many concurrent remote users can reach the client VPN session limit even if site-to-site tunnel count remains low.

Cisco Secure Client/AnyConnect support, authentication architecture and identity policy should be validated against the chosen firmware and license. Organizations should also confirm whether remote users require split tunneling or full tunneling, whether internet traffic should pass through the vMX, and how DNS resolution is provided. Those choices influence both security posture and bandwidth consumption.

If remote access is a major business requirement rather than a secondary feature, size for peak concurrent sessions and aggregate remote-user traffic. A dedicated remote-access service or a larger vMX may be more appropriate than using a Small appliance that is already carrying branch VPN traffic near its performance limit.

Migration planning from a physical data centre

A common reason to deploy vMX Small is a cloud migration. The organization may already have Meraki branches whose VPN hub is a physical MX in a data centre. As applications move into the cloud, a vMX can provide a new headend close to those workloads. The migration should be planned so that branch routes change in controlled stages and users do not lose access to services that remain in the data centre.

Start by categorizing applications into data-centre-only, cloud-only and hybrid dependencies. A cloud application may still authenticate against an on-premises directory, query a database in the data centre or write backups to a legacy storage system. Moving the user-facing server does not automatically remove the network dependencies behind it. Each dependency needs a route, security policy and latency assessment.

During coexistence, branches may need paths to both the old data centre and the new cloud. Route preference must be deterministic so that traffic for a migrated subnet goes to the correct hub. Temporary duplicate routes can create asymmetric paths or black holes. Change plans should specify the exact subnets being moved, the old next hop, the new next hop, validation tests and the rollback route.

DNS is often overlooked. Applications can be reachable over the new VPN path while users continue resolving an old address because internal DNS has not been updated. Migration runbooks should therefore include DNS record changes, cache behavior and validation from representative branch clients. Monitoring should cover application response, not just ICMP reachability.

Once the migration is stable, remove temporary tunnels, routes and firewall rules that are no longer required. Leaving obsolete coexistence configuration in place increases troubleshooting complexity and can create unintended access paths. The final state should be simpler than the transitional state.

Deployment sequence for a controlled vMX Small project

Cloud cost and procurement considerations

A vMX Small quotation is not the complete cost of the service. The project can include Cisco Meraki licensing, cloud compute resources, storage or image-related charges where applicable, public IP resources, data processing, internet egress, inter-region traffic and implementation services. The exact cloud bill depends on the platform and architecture, so procurement teams should separate the Meraki commercial line items from the cloud provider’s recurring consumption charges.

The business should also decide who owns the cloud subscription. In many projects the customer already has an AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or Alibaba Cloud account managed by an internal cloud team or managed-service provider. The vMX is deployed into that environment while the Meraki license is sourced through the network procurement channel. Clear ownership avoids delays when the network team is ready to deploy but does not have permissions to create the necessary cloud resources.

For UAE procurement, specify whether the quote is required for Dubai delivery and invoicing, whether implementation is on-site or remote, and whether the customer needs only licensing or also configuration and migration services. Since vMX is virtual, there is no physical appliance shipment in the usual sense, but commercial paperwork, subscriptions and service scope still need to be aligned with the customer’s procurement process.

When comparing quotations, ensure that each supplier is quoting the same appliance size, license feature tier and term. A lower price may represent a shorter term or different license edition rather than a genuine like-for-like saving. Ask for the exact Cisco part number or subscription description to be shown on the quote so that commercial comparisons remain transparent.

Common buyer mistakes to avoid

UAE deployment planning and support scope

For organizations in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Sharjah and other UAE locations, the vMX project is usually a combination of cloud networking, Meraki configuration and branch integration. The implementation can often be performed remotely once cloud and Dashboard access are prepared, but on-site work may still be useful when branch MX appliances, WAN circuits or local routing need changes as part of the migration.

FourTeck can scope the requirement around the exact deployment model rather than treating vMX Small as a standalone license sale. Useful services can include sizing review, cloud network coordination, Meraki Dashboard configuration, Auto VPN integration, migration planning, route validation, security policy implementation, testing and operational handover. The service scope should be stated clearly so the customer knows which cloud-side tasks are included and which remain with its cloud provider or internal team.

For broader infrastructure requirements, buyers can review FourTeck UAE for UAE technology solutions and FourTeck IT Services UAE for implementation and support services. Organizations operating across multiple countries can also use FourTeck global as a broader company reference.

For firewall and secure networking projects specifically, Firewall Dubai by FourTeck provides a specialist route for discussing cloud security, branch firewall and SD-WAN requirements. These resources complement the specific vMX Small quotation rather than replacing a formal sizing review.

Technical validation checklist before deployment

A successful vMX deployment depends on details that sit across both the Meraki and cloud environments. The following checks should be completed before the production cutover. They are intentionally practical: each item removes a specific source of design or migration risk.

Performance testing after go-live

A deployment is not complete when the VPN indicator turns green. Baseline performance should be measured after cutover using representative applications and traffic patterns. The team should record normal throughput, latency, packet loss and session behavior so that future troubleshooting has a reference point. Synthetic speed tests alone are not enough because business applications can be more sensitive to latency, packet size or connection count than a bulk file transfer.

Test from more than one branch. A problem seen from only one site may be caused by its local internet circuit, branch MX policy or ISP path rather than the vMX. Conversely, a slowdown affecting many branches at the same time may indicate cloud-side capacity, routing or application issues. Dashboard visibility should be correlated with cloud provider metrics to avoid diagnosing only one side of the path.

Capacity monitoring should focus on peak periods, not daily averages. If the vMX regularly approaches its design limit during backup windows, month-end processing or software distribution, users may experience intermittent performance degradation even though the average utilization looks modest. The organization should define an internal threshold that triggers a sizing review before a hard limit is reached.

When security features are enabled or changed, repeat the baseline. Inspection features can alter performance characteristics, and policy changes can affect application behavior. Maintaining before-and-after measurements makes future license or appliance-size decisions evidence-based.

Operational lifecycle and renewal planning

vMX Small should be treated as part of a service lifecycle. The business needs an owner for Meraki licensing, cloud resources, firmware management, security policy and recovery testing. Because the platform is virtual, it can be easy to assume infrastructure lifecycle is somebody else’s responsibility. In practice, the service spans several ownership domains, and gaps between them are a common source of avoidable downtime.

Renewal should begin with a sizing review. If branch count, remote-user sessions or cloud traffic have grown during the current term, the next renewal may be the right point to move from vMX Small to Medium. Renewal is also an opportunity to review licensing model changes, feature requirements and whether the cloud region or architecture still matches the application estate.

Firmware planning matters because capabilities evolve. Cisco documentation notes that features such as NAT mode and Layer 3/Layer 7 firewall or Advanced Security functions depend on supported MX firmware versions. Before enabling a feature based on documentation, confirm that the organization’s firmware track and vMX deployment support it. Schedule upgrades with application validation and a rollback plan consistent with business criticality.

Finally, keep architecture documentation current. The most valuable record is not a screenshot of the Dashboard; it is a concise diagram showing branches, vMX instances, cloud networks, route relationships, security boundaries, DNS dependencies and failover behavior. That diagram helps network, cloud, security and application teams troubleshoot the same system from a shared model.

Questions to answer before requesting a Cisco Meraki vMX Small quote

A complete quotation can be prepared much faster when the customer provides a few architecture inputs. These are not administrative questions; each item affects the recommended size, license or implementation scope.

• Which cloud platform and region will host the vMX? The deployment method and routing integration depend on the cloud environment.
• How many Meraki sites will connect? Include planned branches during the license term, not only current active locations.
• What is the expected aggregate branch-to-cloud traffic? Provide peak estimates for business hours, backups, updates and large data transfers.
• Will the vMX perform security inspection? IDS/IPS or other advanced security functions can change the applicable throughput design point.
• Is client VPN required? State the expected peak remote-user session count and whether user internet traffic should traverse the vMX.
• What licensing model does the Meraki organization use? Identify subscription, co-termination or an existing legacy per-device organization.
• What term is required? Align the license term with the project and procurement cycle.
• Is redundancy required? State whether the service must survive an instance, availability-zone or region failure.
• Is this a new deployment or migration? Migrations may need temporary routes, coexistence tunnels and cutover planning.
• Do you need configuration services? Clarify whether the quote should include only licensing or also cloud coordination, Meraki setup, testing and handover.

Frequently asked buyer questions

Decision recap for Cisco Meraki vMX Small

What FourTeck needs for an accurate vMX Small quotation

Providing the following information allows the quotation to reflect the actual deployment rather than a generic license line. If some values are not known, estimated ranges are still useful and can be refined during the design review.

Confirm whether vMX Small is the right cloud headend for your Meraki network

Share your cloud platform, branch count, expected VPN traffic, Meraki licensing model and resilience requirement. FourTeck can use those inputs to compare vMX Small with Medium or Large, identify the appropriate license path and scope the deployment or migration work for Dubai and UAE environments.