Cisco Meraki MR28 Dubai — Cloud-Managed Wi-Fi 6 Access Point

The Cisco Meraki MR28 is a compact, dual-band 802.11ax access point aimed at basic and medium-density indoor deployments that need centrally managed business Wi-Fi without the operational overhead of a traditional on-premises wireless controller. It combines a 2×2:2 radio design, Wi-Fi 6 efficiency features, integrated Bluetooth Low Energy, a Gigabit Ethernet uplink and Meraki cloud management in a platform intended for straightforward branch, small-office, retail, classroom, clinic and distributed-site deployments.

Direct answer: what the MR28 is and what buyers should confirm

The Cisco Meraki MR28 is an entry-level, cloud-managed indoor Wi-Fi 6 access point. It is mainly used to provide centrally managed wireless connectivity for business locations where a 2×2:2 access point and one Gigabit Ethernet uplink are sufficient for the expected user density and application mix. Organizations that should consider it include smaller offices, branches, reception areas, retail units, clinics, classrooms, professional-service workplaces and distributed sites that value Meraki Dashboard visibility and remote administration.

The most important factor to confirm is not the headline wireless rate by itself. A buyer should confirm whether the intended RF environment, number and type of client devices, application demand, channel plan, switch infrastructure, PoE budget and licensing model match what the MR28 can deliver. The platform supports a maximum dual-radio aggregate frame rate described by Cisco Meraki as up to 1.5 Gbps under its practical channel configuration, but real application throughput is influenced by client capability, protocol overhead, channel reuse, interference, signal quality and the single 1 GbE wired uplink.

FourTeck can help determine the right AP count, mounting positions, switch and PoE requirements, Meraki licensing approach, VLAN and SSID design, guest-access policy, roaming expectations, migration scope and whether an alternative AP with additional spatial streams, a dedicated security-scanning radio or a multigigabit uplink would be a more appropriate fit.

Where the Cisco Meraki MR28 fits in a business wireless design

The MR28 sits in the Meraki indoor wireless portfolio as an entry-level Wi-Fi 6 model. That positioning matters because it frames the right purchasing question. The MR28 should not be evaluated as though every Wi-Fi 6 access point were interchangeable. Its value comes from combining cloud-managed operations with a practical radio specification for locations that need dependable business connectivity but do not require the higher radio capacity, additional monitoring radios or faster wired interfaces found on more capable models.

For a small branch with laptops, smartphones, payment terminals, printers, collaboration traffic and modest guest access, the MR28 can be a sensible platform when the RF plan is clean and client density is controlled. For a crowded auditorium, large training centre, dense open-plan floor, high-throughput design studio or environment where many clients simultaneously move large data sets, an entry-level 2×2 AP may not be the right starting point. In those situations, AP selection should consider higher spatial-stream counts, greater radio resources, additional monitoring capability and potentially multigigabit switching.

This distinction is important in Dubai projects because many sites combine compact floor plans with substantial device counts. A physically small office can still be a demanding RF environment if every employee has several wireless devices, voice and video traffic is continuous, neighbouring WLANs are visible, and meeting rooms produce short bursts of heavy concurrency. The MR28 can still form part of such a network, but the number and placement of APs must be based on measured conditions rather than square-metre rules alone.

Key MR28 specifications explained for procurement teams

Why Wi-Fi 6 features matter on the MR28

Understanding the 1.5 Gbps aggregate figure

Cisco Meraki describes the MR28 as supporting up to a 1.5 Gbps dual-radio aggregate frame rate. The 5 GHz radio is documented at up to 1,201 Mbps, while the practical 2.4 GHz figure used in the aggregate is 287 Mbps because Meraki does not enable 40 MHz channels on 2.4 GHz in normal enterprise operation. The radio chipset can theoretically support a higher 2.4 GHz PHY value with 40 MHz channel bonding, but Cisco explicitly notes that this is not recommended for real-world enterprise deployments. This is a useful example of why procurement should rely on the configured enterprise behavior of the product rather than only on silicon-level maximums.

PHY rate is also different from usable application throughput. Wi-Fi uses shared airtime and includes protocol overhead, acknowledgements, contention, retransmissions and management traffic. A client farther from the AP may step down to a lower modulation rate. Interference from nearby networks or non-Wi-Fi sources may consume airtime. The client device itself may have a one-stream or two-stream radio and may not support the same channel width. The wired side of the MR28 is a single Gigabit Ethernet interface, so the network should not be designed under the assumption that the advertised dual-radio aggregate is an equivalent guaranteed wired payload rate.

For business planning, the better question is whether the MR28 can meet the required per-user experience and total cell demand under the intended conditions. Voice calls need low latency and predictable roaming more than huge throughput. Web, ERP, SaaS and collaboration traffic usually benefit from reliable signal and low contention. Large file transfers, workstation backups or media production can place much heavier sustained demand on the AP and upstream network. The mix of these workloads should influence AP selection and quantity.

Meraki cloud management: operational value beyond the radio hardware

The MR28 is managed through the Meraki cloud rather than by a traditional on-premises wireless LAN controller appliance. This operational model is one of the main reasons organizations buy Meraki wireless. A network administrator can configure SSIDs, VLAN behavior, security policy, traffic shaping, RF settings, guest access and monitoring from Meraki Dashboard. Distributed locations can be managed from the same interface, which is particularly useful for businesses with several branches in the UAE or a mix of UAE and international offices.

Cloud management changes both deployment and support workflows. New APs can be associated with the organization and network, connected at the remote location and then obtain their configuration through the cloud. Central visibility helps support teams identify client association problems, application traffic behavior, connectivity status and other operational indicators without relying entirely on local staff. Firmware is also managed as part of the Meraki platform, reducing the need to manually download and install wireless software on each access point.

This does not eliminate planning. The dashboard can simplify configuration, but it cannot compensate for poor AP placement, insufficient PoE, badly designed VLANs, inadequate internet connectivity, overloaded switching or an RF plan created without considering walls and neighboring radios. A successful Meraki deployment still needs correct IP addressing, DHCP, DNS, firewall reachability, switch configuration and cabling. Cloud management makes these components easier to operate once the architecture is sound.

Organizations with strict governance should also consider how dashboard administrator roles, authentication, change control and operational ownership will be managed. The central platform is powerful, so administrative access should follow least-privilege principles, named-account practices and the organization’s wider identity and security policy. Buyers comparing Meraki with controller-based wireless should include these operational differences in the evaluation rather than comparing AP hardware specifications alone.

Licensing is a mandatory part of the MR28 purchase decision

Cisco’s licensing documentation identifies MR28-HW within the MR wireless licensing product class. Depending on the customer’s organization and commercial model, the relevant licensing approach may be Meraki subscription licensing, co-termination licensing or another supported licensing mode. A new project should not assume that an old license SKU or term structure is automatically the correct choice. Licensing has evolved, and Cisco documentation currently positions subscription licensing as the preferred fit for many new and renewing customers where available.

The practical procurement implication is that an MR28 hardware quotation should be evaluated together with license quantity and term. A project with ten APs requires an appropriate entitlement for the active devices. If a customer already operates Meraki wireless, its current organization licensing mode, renewal date and available entitlement should be reviewed before adding hardware. Meraki wireless licenses are generally not model-specific in the way some appliance licenses are; this can make upgrades and replacements more flexible, but the exact licensing state of the customer organization still needs to be checked.

License term choice affects budgeting and lifecycle planning. A three-year, five-year or longer planning horizon may align with a branch lease, technology refresh or corporate budget cycle, but the best term depends on the current Cisco licensing offer available to the customer and the expected life of the deployment. A buyer should also check whether the project includes support expectations that depend on maintaining valid licensing. Meraki licensing documentation states that enterprise technical support, updates and access to cloud-based features supported by the hardware are included within the licensing model.

For quotation accuracy, provide the number of MR28 units, whether this is a new Meraki organization or an expansion, the current licensing mode if applicable, the desired term, and any planned hardware replacement. That information helps avoid a common procurement mistake: buying the APs correctly while leaving license scope unresolved until installation day.

PoE, switching and the Gigabit uplink

The MR28 supports 802.3af Power over Ethernet and Cisco documents maximum power consumption at 15 W under 802.3af operation, with actual consumption varying by use. This makes the AP compatible with a broad range of enterprise PoE access switches, but the word compatible should not be confused with guaranteed capacity across an entire switch. The switch must have enough available PoE budget for every powered device connected to it, including other APs, IP phones, cameras, access-control devices and IoT equipment.

For example, a 24-port PoE switch may physically have enough ports for a group of MR28 APs while still being under-sized in its total wattage budget once phones and cameras are included. Good design therefore checks both per-port standard and aggregate PoE budget. Redundant power supplies, switch stacking and UPS runtime may also matter if wireless availability is business-critical. The AP can only remain online during a local power event if the upstream switch and network path remain powered.

The wired data interface is one 10/100/1000 BASE-T Ethernet port. For many small-business and branch use cases this is appropriate, particularly when typical applications are SaaS, web, voice and collaboration. However, buyers expecting very high sustained wireless throughput should recognise the architectural ceiling of a single Gigabit uplink. Higher-tier APs with multigigabit Ethernet may provide more headroom in networks designed to make use of broader radio capacity and faster access switching.

Cabling should be part of the design rather than an afterthought. Existing horizontal copper should be tested if its quality or termination is uncertain. Cable pathways should avoid locations where heat, moisture, electrical interference or physical damage could compromise the link. A ceiling-mounted AP also needs a clean cable route that does not leave the patch lead hanging visibly or place mechanical strain on the RJ45 connection.

If PoE is not available, Cisco documents compatible power options, but the MR28 has an important adapter restriction: only the MA-PWR-30W-XX family listed for the regional variants is compatible, and previous-generation Meraki AC adapters are not compatible. This is a small detail with large installation consequences. A quotation using local power should identify the correct adapter variant rather than assuming an older Meraki adapter in stock can be reused.

RF planning for Dubai offices, branches and commercial interiors

Wireless design should begin with the building, not the access point datasheet. Dubai commercial interiors frequently contain glass partitions, concrete structural elements, metal-backed decorative finishes, dense meeting-room clusters, service corridors, lift cores and neighboring tenant networks. Each of these can change how 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz signals propagate. A site that looks small on a floor plan can therefore need more APs than a simple coverage-radius calculation suggests.

The most common mistake is to design only for coverage. A laptop may see a usable SSID while still suffering poor performance because too many clients share the same cell, because the channel is congested or because the client transmit power is weaker than the AP’s. Enterprise Wi-Fi should be designed for bidirectional communication and capacity. This is especially important for video meetings, voice-over-Wi-Fi, softphones and interactive cloud applications, where packet loss, latency and jitter are often more noticeable than raw download speed.

The 2.4 GHz band offers longer reach but far less channel reuse than 5 GHz. In a modern office, it is often better to encourage capable clients toward 5 GHz while retaining 2.4 GHz for devices that require it. The correct settings depend on client compatibility and the surrounding RF environment. Excessively high transmit power can be counterproductive because clients may hear the AP from farther away than the AP can reliably hear the client, and adjacent cells may overlap too heavily. More power is not a substitute for proper AP placement.

Channel width also matters. Wider channels can increase peak PHY rates when spectrum is clean, but they consume more spectrum and reduce the number of non-overlapping channels available for reuse. In a dense multi-tenant building, narrower channels may provide a better overall experience because they reduce contention and improve reuse. The right design therefore balances throughput target, neighboring networks, AP count and the device population rather than simply enabling the widest possible channel everywhere.

For new deployments, a predictive design can establish the initial AP plan using wall materials and expected demand. A physical survey or post-install validation is still valuable where voice, high-density usage or difficult construction materials are present. For existing networks, measured client experience and spectrum conditions can reveal whether a performance problem requires another AP, a channel-plan change, a cabling repair, a switch upgrade or simply relocation of an existing AP.

Security capabilities and what they do not replace

Roaming, voice and collaboration workloads

Cisco Meraki lists support for fast Layer 2 roaming mechanisms such as 802.11r, PMK and OKC, along with distributed or centralized Layer 3 roaming options. Roaming support is useful for mobile workers, warehouse handhelds, tablets, voice devices and laptops moving between AP coverage areas. The client usually decides when to roam, however, so enabling a protocol does not guarantee perfect roaming if the client driver, signal overlap or RF design is poor.

Voice and video applications need predictable latency, sufficient signal quality and good cell transitions. The MR28 supports quality-of-service mechanisms including WMM access categories, DSCP handling and application traffic shaping. In a real deployment, these should align with the wired QoS policy. Marking traffic on the wireless side provides limited value if upstream switches, routers and WAN links discard or ignore those markings, or if the internet circuit itself is saturated.

A meeting-room-heavy office can create unusual demand patterns. During normal desk work, client traffic may be modest. At the top of each hour, several rooms may launch video calls simultaneously, and nearby users may also join from laptops and phones. Capacity planning should account for these bursts. An AP placed in a corridor may technically cover several rooms but still suffer because walls attenuate the signal and all rooms share the same airtime. In such cases, AP placement closer to the actual client population may matter more than headline transmit power.

For voice-sensitive deployments, FourTeck can incorporate expected roaming paths, minimum signal targets, channel reuse and switch QoS into the design. The goal is not to force a particular AP count but to create cells that support the user experience required by the business applications.

BLE, analytics and location-aware use cases

The MR28 includes a Bluetooth Low Energy 5 radio with beacon and scanning support. This capability can support Meraki-related IoT and analytics use cases where compatible devices, software and licensing are in place. The presence of BLE should not be interpreted as a complete asset-tracking solution by itself. A working application may require compatible beacons, sensor ecosystems, APIs, platform integrations and a deployment density appropriate for the desired location accuracy.

Cisco also documents embedded location analytics and device-tracking functions. For business buyers, the useful question is what operational problem the analytics will solve. A retailer may want aggregate visitor behavior. A workplace may want occupancy insight. A facilities team may need integration with supported sensors or beacons. Each scenario has different privacy, accuracy and integration requirements. The AP hardware is only one component of the solution.

Where privacy rules or internal governance apply, wireless analytics should be designed with data minimization and access control in mind. Technical capability does not automatically establish an appropriate policy. Organizations should determine what data is collected, how it is used, who can see it and how long it is retained. This is particularly important where wireless telemetry intersects with employee or visitor behavior.

If BLE or analytics is a key reason for purchasing the MR28, include that requirement in the quotation request rather than treating it as an optional future detail. Doing so allows the network and application dependencies to be identified before the APs are installed.

Typical deployment scenarios

When the MR28 may not be the best choice

A balanced product page should identify the boundaries of the model. The MR28 is not the automatic choice for every indoor Wi-Fi 6 requirement. Its 2×2:2 radio design and single Gigabit Ethernet interface place it in an entry-level class. If the project involves very high client concurrency, heavy sustained throughput, advanced security-scanning expectations, external antennas or a deliberate multigigabit access-layer architecture, another AP should be compared.

The MR28 also lacks a dedicated security-scanning radio. Its WIDS/WIPS and rogue detection are performed opportunistically on the client-serving radios. For many small-business deployments that may be acceptable. For organizations where continuous scanning is a strong requirement, a model with dedicated monitoring resources can be more appropriate. This is a functional difference rather than simply a matter of speed.

External-antenna requirements are another reason to look elsewhere. The MR28 uses internal antennas. That simplifies normal office installation but is less flexible for unusual spaces that need directional coverage, long aisles, challenging mounting positions or a specialist antenna pattern. Warehouse, industrial or outdoor projects should be treated as separate design problems and matched with hardware intended for those conditions.

Finally, lifecycle planning matters. Cisco’s currently published end-of-life table lists several MR models with 2026 end-of-sale notices, but MR28 is not shown in that table at the time this content was prepared. Procurement teams should still confirm current availability and Cisco ordering status when requesting a quotation, because product status can change after publication. A current quote is more reliable than assuming indefinite supply from a static web page.

MR28 versus higher-capacity Meraki indoor AP options

Cisco’s MR family documentation has historically compared the MR28 with models such as MR36, MR44, MR46 and MR56. Several of those specific models now have published 2026 end-of-sale notices, so a current project should not automatically copy an older comparison table into a new bill of materials. The better approach is to compare the MR28 with currently orderable alternatives that meet the same deployment objective at quotation time.

How to estimate AP quantity without oversimplifying the design

There is no responsible fixed statement such as one MR28 per a particular number of square metres that works for every office. AP count is affected by walls, ceiling height, channel plan, client density, application demand, roaming requirements, neighboring networks and the receive capability of the endpoints. Two offices with the same floor area can need different numbers of access points.

A useful sizing process starts with the floor plan and occupancy pattern. Mark work areas, meeting rooms, reception, corridors, enclosed offices, storage rooms and any high-demand zones. Estimate the maximum simultaneous client count rather than only the number of employees. A staff member may carry a laptop, smartphone and tablet, while meeting-room displays, printers, IoT devices and guest phones add to the total. Then identify applications that need predictable performance, such as softphones, video calls or cloud desktops.

Next consider coverage constraints. Thick concrete walls, metal cabinets and reflective surfaces can reduce or distort signal. An AP should be placed where client devices actually operate, not simply where cabling is convenient. If a network has voice roaming, adjacent cells should overlap appropriately without creating excessive co-channel interference. If capacity rather than coverage is the constraint, adding APs may require lower transmit power and careful channel reuse so the additional radios improve rather than worsen performance.

For a small straightforward office, this process may produce an uncomplicated design. For a larger site, high-density space or migration from a poorly performing WLAN, a survey and measured validation provide much greater confidence. FourTeck can combine the wireless requirement with switch-port count, PoE budget and cabling scope so the quotation reflects the full infrastructure rather than only the AP quantity.

Installation workflow for a controlled MR28 rollout

Migration from an existing wireless network

Replacing an older WLAN with MR28 access points is not only a hardware swap. Existing SSIDs may be tied to RADIUS servers, Active Directory, certificates, captive portals, VLANs, firewall policies, DHCP scopes, print services and application assumptions. A migration plan should identify these dependencies before the old APs are removed.

If the SSID name and security method remain the same, many client devices can reconnect with little user intervention, but this depends on the authentication design. Certificate-based enterprise Wi-Fi may require device-management profiles and a trusted certificate chain. A new security mode may expose old endpoints that do not support WPA3 or the selected EAP method. Guest portals may need branding, terms, identity integration or sponsor workflows recreated in the Meraki configuration.

The physical AP locations should also be reassessed. An old wireless network may have been designed for previous-generation clients and lower user density. Reusing every old mounting point can preserve a bad RF design. New Wi-Fi 6 hardware can improve efficiency, but it does not make concrete walls transparent or eliminate co-channel interference. Migration is an opportunity to adjust the cell layout based on today’s floor plan and device population.

A phased rollout can reduce risk in larger sites. A pilot area can validate authentication, VLAN policy, application behavior and client compatibility before the rest of the building is changed. For small branches, a carefully planned cutover outside peak hours may be simpler. The correct method depends on how much disruption the business can tolerate and whether the old and new WLANs can coexist temporarily without creating interference or naming conflicts.

The final migration step is operational. Support staff should know where to view client status in Dashboard, how to distinguish an RF issue from DHCP or internet failure, how firmware upgrades are scheduled and who has authority to change SSIDs or security settings. A cloud-managed platform delivers the most value when the support process changes with it.

Procurement details that affect the final MR28 quotation

The hardware ordering identifier documented by Cisco Meraki is MR28-HW. A complete commercial request should go beyond that single line item. Buyers should specify the quantity, required license term or current licensing context, power method, installation requirement, expected AP mounting environment, switch availability and any need for cabling, configuration or migration.

If PoE injectors are required, Cisco Meraki lists compatible injector options separately. Power cords may also be separate depending on the injector and regional ordering structure. If local AC power is planned instead of PoE, the MR28 has a specific adapter compatibility restriction, so the correct regional MA-PWR-30W-XX option must be matched to the installation. Reusing a previous-generation adapter should not be assumed.

Mounting accessories included with the AP should be checked against the physical site. Suspended ceilings, solid concrete, wall mounting and exposed industrial surfaces can require different fixing methods even when the AP’s own mounting plate is supplied. Building access rules may also require out-of-hours work, permits, lifts or coordination with facilities teams. These items can affect project cost more than the AP mounting time itself.

For regional procurement and wider infrastructure requirements, buyers can review FourTeck IT Services UAE for implementation support and Firewall Dubai by FourTeck for complementary network-security requirements. These resources are useful when wireless is part of a larger branch, office or security refresh rather than a stand-alone AP purchase.

Compatibility checklist before ordering

Performance dependencies that should appear in the design discussion

The MR28’s performance is shaped by more than the AP itself. The most immediate dependency is the client device. A one-stream smartphone at the edge of the cell cannot use the same PHY rate as a strong-signal two-stream laptop near the AP. Drivers, operating-system power saving and roaming logic also influence user experience. When one particular device type reports poor Wi-Fi while others perform well, the client may be part of the problem.

The second dependency is airtime. Wi-Fi is a shared medium. A small number of slow or distant clients can consume disproportionate airtime because each frame takes longer to transmit. Legacy protocols and low basic rates can increase management overhead. Excessive SSIDs increase beacon traffic. These are reasons why a disciplined WLAN configuration can outperform a more feature-heavy configuration that broadcasts many unnecessary networks.

The third dependency is the wired path. The AP connects through Gigabit Ethernet, and all user traffic eventually crosses switches, routers, firewalls and WAN circuits. If the switch uplink is congested or the internet circuit is saturated, changing the AP may not solve the complaint. Likewise, a DNS delay or authentication-server timeout can feel like “slow Wi-Fi” even when RF conditions are good.

The fourth dependency is the RF environment. Neighboring APs, co-channel contention, hidden-node behavior and non-Wi-Fi interference can all reduce usable airtime. In a multi-tenant building, conditions can change after a neighboring office installs new access points. Periodic review and adaptive RF management are therefore useful even after a successful initial deployment.

The fifth dependency is expectations. Users may compare enterprise Wi-Fi with a speed test performed at home directly beside a router. Business networks often prioritize consistent coverage, secure authentication, roaming, guest segmentation and supportability over one peak speed result. The design should define acceptable application experience so success can be measured against business needs rather than a single headline number.

Support, warranty and lifecycle considerations

Cisco Meraki documents the MR28 as an indoor access point with a lifetime hardware warranty and advanced replacement included, subject to the applicable Meraki warranty terms. Licensing also carries the cloud-management and enterprise support relationship. Buyers should keep serial numbers, organization ownership and licensing records under the control of the business rather than leaving them tied only to an individual installer’s account.

Hardware lifecycle should be separated from software and commercial lifecycle. An AP can have a long hardware warranty while the manufacturer’s product lifecycle eventually moves through end-of-sale and end-of-support stages. Cisco Meraki publishes lifecycle dates when a model is announced for end of sale. At the time of this page preparation, the published EOL table identifies several MR models with 2026 dates but does not list MR28. That is useful information today, but purchasing teams should still request current availability confirmation because the manufacturer can update lifecycle notices later.

For a multi-year deployment, renewal planning is as important as initial purchase. License terms, organization licensing mode and budget ownership should be documented so renewal does not become an emergency. Where a network contains many branches, an asset register can track AP location, serial number, switch port, installed date and support owner. That information reduces downtime when a device needs replacement or when a location is relocated.

Organizations should also decide how firmware upgrades are governed. Meraki automates cloud-delivered firmware, but business-critical networks may still need maintenance windows, pre-change communication and post-upgrade validation. The operational benefit is that the platform centralizes the process; governance still belongs to the customer.

Frequently asked buyer questions about the Cisco Meraki MR28

Buying the MR28 as part of a wider network refresh

Wireless replacement often exposes other infrastructure issues. A business may discover that access switches lack PoE capacity, old cabling is unreliable, VLANs are poorly documented or the internet firewall has become a bottleneck. Treating the MR28 purchase as part of a complete network path can prevent the new APs from inheriting those limitations.

The switch layer should provide enough ports, PoE headroom and uplink capacity for the AP estate. If the business plans to add cameras, phones or access-control devices, reserve power and ports for those endpoints as well. A managed switch also provides the VLAN tagging, troubleshooting visibility and QoS controls expected in a business WLAN. Consumer unmanaged switches are rarely a suitable foundation for a segmented enterprise wireless design.

The firewall and WAN edge should be sized for aggregate user demand. Better Wi-Fi can increase internet traffic because users are no longer constrained by poor local connectivity. If several branches connect to cloud services, SD-WAN, VPN or centralized security policy may become relevant. Wireless is only the first hop of the user journey; performance problems further upstream will still be visible to the user.

Server and application dependencies can matter as well. Local authentication, DNS, DHCP, file services or application servers must have resilient network paths. Customers planning a broader infrastructure upgrade can reference Server Dubai by FourTeck for server-side infrastructure options while keeping wireless, switching and security requirements aligned in the same project plan.

This broader view avoids a common procurement pattern where each component is purchased independently and integration problems appear only during commissioning. A coordinated bill of materials can identify the APs, licenses, switches, optics or uplinks, firewall changes, cabling, rack capacity, UPS and installation services as one design.

Decision recap: is the Cisco Meraki MR28 the right AP?

What FourTeck needs for an accurate MR28 quotation

These inputs allow the quotation to distinguish between an AP-only supply request and a complete wireless deployment. They also make it easier to identify when the MR28 should be retained, increased in quantity or replaced in the design by a different access point class.

Plan the Cisco Meraki MR28 deployment around your actual users and network

For the right environment, the MR28 provides a compact Wi-Fi 6 platform with Meraki cloud operations, business security features and straightforward PoE deployment. The strongest result comes from validating RF conditions, client density, switch capacity, licensing and installation before purchase. FourTeck can prepare a supply-only or implementation quotation based on the level of assistance required.